| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
From the Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Zachary M. Grinspan, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Harkness Pavilion, 5th Floor, 180 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY 10032-3791 zg2126{at}columbia.edu
 |
SECTION 1 |
|---|
 Top. SECTION 1 SECTION 2SECTION 3SECTION 4DISCUSSION: SUSAC SYNDROMEFOLLOW-UPDISCLOSUREREFERENCES |
|---|
She had had a febrile seizure at age 4, and several brief convulsions as a teenager. A sleep-deprived EEG had been negative. She took phenytoin for a year, then stopped prior to her first pregnancy. She had no further convulsions.
This was her fifth pregnancy. She had 2 healthy children, 1 abruption at 23 weeks, and 1 elective abortion. Her maternal grandmother had died from a ruptured cerebral aneurysm.
She had no complaints but could not explain why she was in the hospital. She was afebrile with normal blood pressure. She appeared well and had a normal postpartum abdominal examination. She was inattentive and abulic with sparse but fluent speech. She recalled 2 of 3 words at 5 minutes, but had no memory for recent events, including her delivery. She could not describe cocktail ingredients, despite working as a bartender, but correctly recited old addresses. Cranial nerves were normal. Both optic discs had sharp margins by bedside funduscopic examination. Strength was full. Reflexes were brisk, with 3 beats of clonus at her right ankle. Toes were equivocal on the right and downgoing on the left. Sensation and coordination were normal. Gait was narrow-based and slightly unsteady, but she did not fall.
Questions for consideration:
|
SECTION 2 |
|---|
|
Top.SECTION 1SECTION 2SECTION 3SECTION 4DISCUSSION: SUSAC SYNDROMEFOLLOW-UPDISCLOSUREREFERENCES |
|---|
The differential diagnosis includes emergent peripartum conditions, such as dural sinus thrombosis, metastatic choriocarcinoma, and postpartum angiopathy, a form of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.1 Other emergent conditions should be considered, including viral encephalitis (particularly herpesviruses), infectious meningoencephalitis, substance abuse (especially cocaine), complex partial seizures, and intracerebral hemorrhage. Subacute processes, such as demyelinating diseases and paraneoplastic processes, should also be considered.
The evaluation should be broad, including bloodwork, brain imaging, EEG, and CSF examination.
Serum chemistries were normal except for low total protein (5.6 g/dL), albumin (3 g/dL), and calcium (7.8 mg/dL). A complete blood count showed an elevated white blood cell count (14,000 per mm3). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 30 mm/hour and C-reactive protein 33.9 mg/L. Lumbar puncture revealed a protein of 121 mg/dL, normal glucose, 3 white blood cells/mm3, and 23 red blood cells/mm3. Urine toxicology was positive for marijuana. The combined herpes simplex virus (HSV) titer was high, the HSV immunoglobulin M slightly above normal, and the CSF HSV PCR negative. The CSF albumin ratio was high at 30.2 (normal 0–9.0). Additional infectious, coagulation, endocrine, cardiac, lipid, and immunologic studies were unrevealing.
EEG showed generalized slowing with superimposed bursts of left frontotemporal maximal slowing. Head CT found mild diffuse cerebral atrophy and deep frontal white matter lucencies. Brain MRI revealed multiple T2-hyperintense lesions in the cerebellum and cerebral white matter. Many lesions were hypointense on T1-weighted imaging and some demonstrated restricted diffusion. There were multiple lesions in the corpus callosum, many with a rim of T2 hyperintensity around a center of T1 hypointensity (figure 1). There was no abnormal enhancement. Magnetic resonance angiography showed caliber changes in the distal branches of both middle cerebral arteries. Magnetic resonance venography was normal.
|
The patient’s husband, who had been unavailable initially, reported that for several weeks she had had headaches, hearing difficulties, and episodic visual loss, occasionally losing vision in 1 eye for 30 minutes. Subtle memory problems had begun 1 month prior.
Questions for consideration:
|
SECTION 3 |
|---|
|
Top.SECTION 1SECTION 2SECTION 3SECTION 4DISCUSSION: SUSAC SYNDROMEFOLLOW-UPDISCLOSUREREFERENCES |
|---|
CNS vasculopathy, primary or secondary, could explain the distal caliber changes in the middle cerebral arteries. Postpartum angiopathy, a reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, is a parsimonious diagnosis linking her headache, pregnancy, elevated CSF protein, MRI findings, and encephalopathy.2,3 However, postpartum angiopathy typically follows delivery, rather than precedes it, and often presents with vomiting and/or seizures.
Demyelinating disorders, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), could explain the MRI findings, albuminocytologic dissociation, change in mental status, and visual disturbances (i.e., optic neuritis). However, encephalopathy and the high CSF protein are unusual for MS. Pregnancy tends to protect against flares, especially in the third trimester. Optic neuritis worsens over hours to days, and lasts days to weeks, rather than 30 minutes. Finally, in the setting of acute symptoms, MS lesions often enhance on MRI and rarely have limited diffusion. ADEM is typically preceded by a viral illness or immunization. Additionally, the lesions in ADEM are usually larger, at the grey–white junction and deep nuclei, and often confluent.
Multiple emboli could explain multifocal restricted diffusion on MRI. Postpartum deep venous thrombosis (DVT), for example, could cause paradoxical embolization to the brain through a patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, the absence of cortical lesions, the predominance of corpus callosum lesions, and the high CSF protein argue against embolism.
Susac syndrome is a microvasculopathy due to endothelial damage, which links encephalopathy, hearing loss, and visual changes. The distinctive corpus callosum lesions in this patient are like the "snowball" lesions that are characteristic of this disease, and high CSF protein is common.4,5 It is not a known complication of pregnancy.
Question for consideration:
|
SECTION 4 |
|---|
|
Top.SECTION 1SECTION 2SECTION 3SECTION 4DISCUSSION: SUSAC SYNDROMEFOLLOW-UPDISCLOSUREREFERENCES |
|---|
To evaluate for Susac syndrome, ophthalmologic and audiologic evaluations were performed. Bedside dilated funduscopic examination revealed bilateral branch retinal artery occlusions with retinal infarcts. Fluorescein angiography found bilateral retinal infarcts, retinal artery branch occlusions, and arteriolar hyperfluorescence, suggesting a retinal vasculopathic process (figure 2). Audiologic evaluation found low frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
|
Muscle biopsy and additional serum tests to look for evidence of endothelial damage were obtained. Antiendothelial antibody tests were weakly positive, and factor VIII levels were elevated (319%, reference 50–150%). Factor VIII is synthesized and released by endothelial cells, and may rise if they are damaged. A muscle biopsy, including electron microscopy, was normal.
We diagnosed Susac syndrome, or retinocochleocerebral vasculopathy, based on the pathognomonic triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions, and hearing loss. Elevated CSF protein supports vasculopathy, but the affected vessels were too small to be detected by angiography.
Pregnancy was a cognitive distracter in this case. We initially focused on postpartum angiopathy as our leading diagnosis. Only after an unrevealing evaluation for stroke did we learn of the visual and hearing loss. Also of note, initial bedside funduscopic examination found sharp disc margins, but missed the retinal infarcts. Once we considered the rare diagnosis of Susac syndrome, ophthalmologic examination confirmed the branch retinal artery occlusions. This case underscores the importance of the history in an encephalopathic patient and the utility of a broad differential diagnosis.
|
DISCUSSION: SUSAC SYNDROME |
|---|
|
Top.SECTION 1SECTION 2SECTION 3SECTION 4DISCUSSION: SUSAC SYNDROMEFOLLOW-UPDISCLOSUREREFERENCES |
|---|
The current literature only describes about 100 patients with Susac syndrome, but the disease is underappreciated and may be more common. Women outnumber men 3:1. Age at onset is 20 to 40 years, ranging from 9 to 58. The clinical triad may not present together. Months to years may separate the initial symptom from the development of the others.9 Headache, often migrainous, frequently precedes the onset of encephalopathy, and progresses to confusion, memory loss, behavioral changes, dysarthria, and mutism.4,5
CSF typically shows a mild lymphocytic pleocytosis (less than 20) and markedly elevated protein. Oligoclonal bands and elevated immunoglobulin G index may falsely suggest MS.4
Brain MRI reveals multiple small (1–7 mm) white matter lesions in the cerebral hemispheres.10 Many show restricted diffusion, suggesting they represent small infarcts.10 Deep gray, cerebellar, brainstem, and gadolinium-enhancing lesions are common. Leptomeningeal enhancement is occasionally seen. The characteristic callosal lesions in Susac syndrome are frequently misdiagnosed as demyelinating disease. However, their central location, "snowball" appearance on T2-weighted imaging, and evolution into pathognomonic T1-hypointensities are atypical of MS lesions, which are smaller and involve the callosal-septal interface.5 The size of the affected arterioles is below the resolution of angiography, which is typically normal.
Branch retinal artery occlusions present as flashes of light, black spots, scintillating scotoma, or occasionally monocular amaurosis fugax.4 Fluorescein angiography shows retinal artery branch occlusions with hyperfluorescence of the arterial wall and late dye leakage.11 Hearing loss may be gradual, fluctuating, or sudden. Low frequencies are typically lost first, as the apex of the cochlea, which transduces lower frequencies, is more susceptible to infarction.4
With no controlled therapeutic trials in Susac syndrome, treatment recommendations are based upon clinical experience.6,9 Rennebohm and Susac6 outline a detailed aggressive regime, including low-dose aspirin, high-dose IV corticosteroids followed by a prolonged oral taper, monthly IV immunoglobulin, and consideration of cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil based on disease severity.
Only 7 pregnancies in 6 patients with Susac syndrome have been reported. Two developed symptoms during pregnancy, in 1 symptoms abated with pregnancy, and 3 had recurrent encephalopathy postpartum.9 Rennebohm and Susac’s6 analogy to inflammatory myopathy may be instructive for care: pregnant women with inflammatory myopathy often respond to steroids alone, and may flare postpartum.12
The disease is usually self-limited, lasting 2 to 4 years, and most patients eventually return to work. Most are left with bilateral hearing impairment, some (35%–50%) have residual cognitive dysfunction, and as many as 1/3 have relapse of encephalopathy. Asymptomatic visual field defects are more common than symptomatic visual loss.9,13
|
FOLLOW-UP |
|---|
|
Top.SECTION 1SECTION 2SECTION 3SECTION 4DISCUSSION: SUSAC SYNDROMEFOLLOW-UPDISCLOSUREREFERENCES |
|---|
Follow-up MRI 2 weeks postpartum showed new lesions, suggesting continuing disease activity. A repeat fluorescein angiogram showed decreased arterial wall hyperfluorescence. However, the patient improved clinically with fluent spontaneous speech and improved attention and memory. On discharge, 3 weeks postpartum, she demonstrated right visual field deficits, brisk reflexes, and clonus at both ankles, right more than left. Seven months postpartum, she continues to take mycophenolate mofetil, and is slowly tapering prednisone. She still complains of short-term memory problems, right eye visual problems, and poor hearing in her left ear. She fatigues easily, but manages household chores and childcare on her own.
|
DISCLOSURE |
|---|
|
Top.SECTION 1SECTION 2SECTION 3SECTION 4DISCUSSION: SUSAC SYNDROMEFOLLOW-UPDISCLOSUREREFERENCES |
|---|
Disclosure: Author disclosures are provided at the end of the article.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
Top.SECTION 1SECTION 2SECTION 3SECTION 4DISCUSSION: SUSAC SYNDROMEFOLLOW-UPDISCLOSUREREFERENCES |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
