Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
NEUROLOGY 2004;63:407
© 2004 American Academy of Neurology

August 10 Highlight and Commentary

Transient increase of glioma enhancement after irradiation

De Wit et al. determined that increased enhancement of tumors immediately after irradiation does not always imply tumor progression; in some cases it is a transient phenomenon. Such enhancement could be misinterpreted as tumor growth, an important consideration in phase II treatment trials for glioma.
T1-weighted images after gadolinium administration. (A) Immediately following radiotherapy, showing the post-resection cavity. (C) Two months after therapy, when there were new clinical signs: an area of gadolinium uptake and edema with slight midline shift. (E) One year following radiotherapy, resolution of edema and enhancement.

see page 535

Pseudo progression of gliomas after radiotherapy

Commentary by Ulrich Herrlinger, MD; and Johannes Dichgans, MD

Contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI are hallmarks of malignant glioma and are used to monitor their response to therapy. According to the established criteria, a 25% increase of contrast-enhancing lesions is regarded as progressive disease.1 This is based on the presumption that there are essentially no other possible causes for increasing contrast-enhancing lesions.

The report by de Wit et al. in this issue of Neurology, however, shows that the situation is more complicated, because changes induced by radiotherapy may mimic tumor progression. It is already well known that radionecrosis, which typically appears 1 to 2 years after radiotherapy, can be difficult to distinguish from progressive tumor. As a feature which has so far only been occasionally described, de Wit et al. report three patients from a prospective trial who showed transient, presumably non-tumoral progression of contrast-enhancing lesions much earlier, i.e., within 3 months after completion of radiotherapy. So far, there appears to be no radiologic means to distinguish such pseudo-progression from tumor progression. It remains an open question whether PET imaging can provide means to make this distinction.

The present article has major implications for the treatment of patients with glioma in clinical trials: 1) Patients undergoing first-line therapy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be misdiagnosed with progressive tumor shortly after radiotherapy. Unless new techniques provide reliable means to distinguish early progression from post-radiotherapy changes, there is no obvious way to avoid this. 2) More importantly, patients with early progression after radiotherapy cannot be eligible for trials on second-line therapy in malignant glioma. The inclusion of these patients would lead to an overestimation of the therapeutic efficacy of experimental drugs and in some cases to unnecessary further investigations of an ineffective drug.

On a broader scope, the report by de Wit et al. shows that the current response criteria in malignant glioma do not fit all clinical situations and may need some amendment. This applies particularly to the response criteria in trials on local, intratumoral application of drugs or on immunotherapy of glioma where an early transient increase of contrast-enhancing lesions may be frequently observed.

see page 535

Reference

  1. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr., Cairncross JG. Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 1990; 8: 1277–1280.[Abstract]

Related Article

Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression
M. C.Y. de Wit, H. G. de Bruin, W. Eijkenboom, P. A.E. Sillevis Smitt, and M. J. van den Bent
Neurology 2004 63: 535-537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS