Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 28, 2009
(Neurology 2009, doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c33adf)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ilg, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schöls, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ilg, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schöls, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Gait disorders/ataxia
Right arrow All Rehabilitation
Right arrow Spinocerebellar ataxia
Right arrow Motor Control
Right arrow Cerebellum
Right arrow Class III
Received February 26, 2009
Accepted August 11, 2009

Intensive coordinative training improves motor performance in degenerative cerebellar disease

W. Ilg PhD*, M. Synofzik MD, D. Brötz , S. Burkard , M. A. Giese PhD, and L. Schöls MD

From the Departments of Cognitive Neurology (W.I., M.A.G.) and Neurodegeneration (M.S., L.S.), Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, Tübingen; Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology (D.B.), MEG Center, University Tübingen; and Therapy Centre (S.B.), Center of Neurology, University Clinic Tübingen, Germany.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: winfried.ilg{at}uni-tuebingen.de.

Objectives: The cerebellum is known to play a strong functional role in both motor control and motor learning. Hence, the benefit of physiotherapeutic training remains controversial for patients with cerebellar degeneration. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of a 4-week intensive coordinative training for 16 patients with progressive ataxia due to cerebellar degeneration (n = 10) or degeneration of afferent pathways (n = 6).

Methods: Effects were assessed by clinical ataxia rating scales, individual goal attainment scores, and quantitative movement analysis. Four assessments were performed: 8 weeks before, immediately before, directly after, and 8 weeks after training. To control for variability in disease progression, we used an intraindividual control design, where performance changes with and without training were compared.

Results: Significant improvements in motor performance and reduction of ataxia symptoms were observed in clinical scores after training and were sustained at follow-up assessment. Patients with predominant cerebellar ataxia revealed more distinct improvement than patients with afferent ataxia in several aspects of gait like velocity, lateral sway, and intralimb coordination. Consistently, in patients with cerebellar but without afferent ataxia, the regulation of balance in static and dynamic balance tasks improved significantly.

Conclusion: In patients with cerebellar ataxia, coordinative training improves motor performance and reduces ataxia symptoms, enabling them to achieve personally meaningful goals in everyday life. Training effects were more distinct for patients whose afferent pathways were not affected. For both groups, continuous training seems crucial for stabilizing improvements and should become standard of care.

Level of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that coordinative training improves motor performance and reduces ataxia symptoms in patients with progressive cerebellar ataxia.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.