|
|
||||||||
From the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (D.J.T., J.K.R.) and National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (J.A.S.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to the American Academy of Neurology, 1080 Montreal Ave., St. Paul, MN 55116 guidelines{at}aan.com
Objective: To develop a practice parameter for screening methods and assessments of risk for falls pertaining to patients likely to be seen in neurology practices.
Methods: Relevant literature was systematically reviewed and strength of evidence classified based on the American Academy of Neurology's criteria (Level A: established; Level B: probable; Level C: possible).
Results: An increased risk of falls is established among persons with diagnoses of stroke, dementia, and disorders of gait and balance (Level A) and probable among patients with Parkinson disease, peripheral neuropathy, lower extremity weakness or sensory loss, and substantial vision loss (Level B). A history of falling in the past year strongly predicts the likelihood of future falls (Level A). Screening measures have been developed to further assess risks of falls, including functional assessments that may be useful (Levels B and C). Several of these assess overlapping neurologic functions—i.e., gait, mobility, and balance—and there is insufficient evidence to assess whether they offer benefit beyond that provided by a standard neurologic examination.
Conclusions: Patients with neurologic or general conditions associated with an increased risk of falling should be asked about recent falls and further examined for the presence of specific neurologic deficits that predict falls, which include gait and balance disorders; deficits of lower extremity strength, sensation, and coordination; and cognitive impairments. If substantial risks of falls are identified, appropriate interventions that are described in other evidence-based guidelines may be considered.
Supplemental data at www.neurology.org
Information regarding membership of the Quality Standards Subcommittee, its mission, and the American Academy of Neurology's statement on conflict of interest is available online in appendix e-1 of this publication.
Approved by the Quality Standards Subcommittee (appendix e-1) on October 28, 2006; by the Practice Committee on July 16, 2007; by the Executive Committee on November 15, 2007; and by the AAN Board of Directors on December 6, 2007.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Received July 17, 2007. Accepted in final form September 13, 2007.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Gronseth and J. French Invited Article: Practice parameters and technology assessments: What they are, what they are not, and why you should care Neurology, November 11, 2008; 71(20): 1639 - 1643. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Assessing Risk for Falls in Neurology Patients Journal Watch Neurology, April 8, 2008; 2008(408): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
Read all Correspondence
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |