Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Volume 70, Number 6, February 5, 2008
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Podcast
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Correspondence:
View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thurman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thurman, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, J. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow All Clinical Neurology
Right arrow Clinical neurology examination
Right arrow Parkinson's disease/Parkinsonism
Right arrow All Neuromuscular Disease
Right arrow Visual loss
Right arrow All Cerebrovascular disease/Stroke
Right arrow All Cognitive Disorders/Dementia
Right arrow Patient safety
Right arrow Risk factors in epidemiology
NEUROLOGY 2008;70:473-479
© 2008 American Academy of Neurology


Special Article

Practice Parameter: Assessing patients in a neurology practice for risk of falls (an evidence-based review)

Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

David J. Thurman, MD, MPH, Judy A. Stevens, PhD and Jaya K. Rao, MD, MHS

From the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (D.J.T., J.K.R.) and National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (J.A.S.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to the American Academy of Neurology, 1080 Montreal Ave., St. Paul, MN 55116 guidelines{at}aan.com

Objective: To develop a practice parameter for screening methods and assessments of risk for falls pertaining to patients likely to be seen in neurology practices.

Methods: Relevant literature was systematically reviewed and strength of evidence classified based on the American Academy of Neurology's criteria (Level A: established; Level B: probable; Level C: possible).

Results: An increased risk of falls is established among persons with diagnoses of stroke, dementia, and disorders of gait and balance (Level A) and probable among patients with Parkinson disease, peripheral neuropathy, lower extremity weakness or sensory loss, and substantial vision loss (Level B). A history of falling in the past year strongly predicts the likelihood of future falls (Level A). Screening measures have been developed to further assess risks of falls, including functional assessments that may be useful (Levels B and C). Several of these assess overlapping neurologic functions—i.e., gait, mobility, and balance—and there is insufficient evidence to assess whether they offer benefit beyond that provided by a standard neurologic examination.

Conclusions: Patients with neurologic or general conditions associated with an increased risk of falling should be asked about recent falls and further examined for the presence of specific neurologic deficits that predict falls, which include gait and balance disorders; deficits of lower extremity strength, sensation, and coordination; and cognitive impairments. If substantial risks of falls are identified, appropriate interventions that are described in other evidence-based guidelines may be considered.


Supplemental data at www.neurology.org

Information regarding membership of the Quality Standards Subcommittee, its mission, and the American Academy of Neurology's statement on conflict of interest is available online in appendix e-1 of this publication.

Approved by the Quality Standards Subcommittee (appendix e-1) on October 28, 2006; by the Practice Committee on July 16, 2007; by the Executive Committee on November 15, 2007; and by the AAN Board of Directors on December 6, 2007.

Disclosure: The authors report no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Received July 17, 2007. Accepted in final form September 13, 2007.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. Gronseth and J. French
Invited Article: Practice parameters and technology assessments: What they are, what they are not, and why you should care
Neurology, November 11, 2008; 71(20): 1639 - 1643.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch NeurologyHome page
Assessing Risk for Falls in Neurology Patients
Journal Watch Neurology, April 8, 2008; 2008(408): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]

Correspondence:

Read all Correspondence

Practice Parameter: Assessing patients in a neurology practice for risk of falls (an evidence-based
Beau B. Bruce, et al.
Neurology Online, 8 May 2008 [Full text]
Practice Parameter: Assessing patients in a neurology practice for risk of falls (an evidence-based
Joseph H. Friedman
Neurology Online, 8 May 2008 [Full text]
Reply from the authors
David J. Thurman, MD, MPH, et al.
Neurology Online, 8 May 2008 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.