Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Correspondence:
View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halm, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chassin, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halm, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chassin, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Stroke prevention
Right arrow All Clinical trials
Right arrow All Cerebrovascular disease/Stroke
Right arrow Infarction
Right arrowRelated Articles
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:187-194
© 2007 American Academy of Neurology

Has evidence changed practice?

Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials

E. A. Halm, MD, MPH, S. Tuhrim, MD, J. J. Wang, PhD, M. Rojas, PhD, E. L. Hannan, PhD and M. R. Chassin, MD, MPH, MPP

From the Departments of Health Policy (E.A.H., J.J.W., M.R., M.R.C.), Medicine (E.A.H., M.R.C.), and Neurology (S.T.), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York; and Department of Health Policy (E.L.H.), Management, and Behavior, University at Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, NY.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ethan A. Halm, Division of General Internal Medicine, Box 1087, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029; e-mail: ethan.halm{at}mountsinai.org

Objective: To assess how appropriateness of and indications for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have changed following the publication of several large international randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed to rationalize use of CEA.

Methods: The New York Carotid Artery Surgery Study (NYCAS) is a population-based cohort study of all CEAs performed on elderly patients from January 1998 through June 1999 in New York State. Detailed clinical data were abstracted from medical charts to assess indications for and appropriateness of surgery using a list of 1,557 indications for CEA developed by national experts using RAND appropriateness methods. Deaths and strokes within 30 days of surgery were ascertained and confirmed by two physicians.

Results: Among the 9,588 patients, the mean age was 74.6 years and 93.6% had 70 to 99% carotid stenosis. Nearly three-quarters of patients (72.3%) underwent CEA for asymptomatic stenosis, 18.6% for TIA, and 9.1% for stroke. Overall, 87.1% of operations were done for appropriate reasons, 4.3% for uncertain reasons, and 8.6% for inappropriate reasons (vs 32% inappropriate before the RCTs, p < 0.0001). Among procedures judged inappropriate, the most common reasons were high comorbidity in asymptomatic patients (62.2%), operating after a major stroke (14.2%), or for minimal stenosis (10.5%). Among asymptomatic patients, those with high comorbidity had over twice the risk of death or stroke compared to those without high comorbidity (7.13% vs 2.69%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Since publication of the randomized controlled trials, there has been a reduction in the proportion of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for inappropriate reasons. The shift toward many asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA is concerning because the net benefit from surgery for these patients is low and is reduced further for patients with high comorbidity.

Additional material related to this article can be found on the Neurology Web site. Go to www.neurology.org and scroll down the Table of Contents for the January 16 issue to find the title link for this article.

Editorial, see page 172

See also page 195

Supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (RO1 HS09754-01), Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (#020803). Dr. Halm was supported in part by The Robert Wood Johnson Generalist Physician Faculty Scholars Program.

Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Received June 2, 2006. Accepted in final form October 6, 2006.


Related Articles

January 16 Highlights
Neurology 2007 68: 168-169. [Full Text] [PDF]

Improving the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy
T. E. Feasby and H.J.M. Barnett
Neurology 2007 68: 172-173. [Full Text] [PDF]

Mortality from combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass surgery in the US
Richard M. Dubinsky and Sue Min Lai
Neurology 2007 68: 195-197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Correspondence:

Read all Correspondence

Has evidence changed practice?: Appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy after the clinical trials
Seemant Chaturvedi
Neurology Online, 1 Apr 2007 [Full text]
Reply from the Authors
Ethan A. Halm, et al.
Neurology Online, 1 Apr 2007 [Full text]

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.