Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noronha, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noronha, A.
NEUROLOGY 2007;68:S16-S22
© 2007 American Academy of Neurology

Neutralizing antibodies to interferon

Avertano Noronha, MB, MD

From the Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Avertano Noronha, Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637 anoronha{at}neurology.bsd.uchicago.edu

The impact of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to interferon-beta (IFN-ß) on clinical and imaging parameters in multiple sclerosis (MS) is reviewed. An effect on relapse rates and imaging parameters was noted in patients who tested positive for NAbs, but disability measures were unaffected or showed a trend toward improvement. Patients who developed NAbs during treatment with IFN-ß1a tended to remain NAb+, whereas those who developed NAbs during IFN-ß1b treatment tended to revert to NAb– over time. NAbs were more persistent in patients with high titers. The prevalence of NAbs was lower when a higher-than-standard dose of IFN-ß1b was given in a dose-comparison study. The prevalence of NAbs in an observational study of MS patients who exhibited suboptimal treatment responses to IFN-ß1b was significantly less than the reported prevalence in clinical trials. An immunoregulatory effect of immune complexes of cytokine and anticytokine antibodies is proposed to account for the variability of clinical responses seen in patients who develop NAbs to IFN-ß1b.


Disclosure: Dr. Noronha receives research funding from Merck Serono S.A., Berlex, Inc., Biogen Idec, Schering AG, and Teva Neuroscience, Inc. Publication of this supplement was supported by an educational grant from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Neurology® supplements are not peer-reviewed. Information contained in Neurology® supplements represents the opinions of the authors and is not endorsed by nor does it reflect the views of the American Academy of Neurology, Editorial Board, Editor-in-Chief, or Associate Editors of Neurology®.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.