|
|
||||||||
From the Epilepsy Research Branch (Drs. Bookheimer, Blaxton, Gaillard, and Theodore) and Human Motor Control Section (Dr. Zeffiro), NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. S.Y. Bookheimer, Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, UCLA School of Medicine, 660 Charles Young Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90095; e-mail: sbook{at}loni.ucla.edu
OBJECTIVE: To identify automatic speech tasks that reliably demonstrate increased regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in Brocas and Wernickes areas of the cortex using PET.
BACKGROUND: Localizing language with direct cortical stimulation mapping requires that patients have a stable baseline on tests that engage eloquent cortex. For dysphasic patients or younger children, automatic speech tasks such as counting are often used in lieu of more complex language tests. Evidence from both lesion and neuroimaging studies suggests that these tasks may not adequately engage language cortices. In this study, we examined rCBF during automatic oromotor and speech tasks of varying complexity to identify those eliciting increased CBF in Brocas and Wernickes areas.
METHODS: Eight normal volunteers underwent PET during rest, tongue movements, and three automatic speech tasks: repeating a phoneme sequence, repeating the months of the year, and reciting a memorized prose passage. Images were averaged across subjects and compared across tasks for regional localization and laterality.
RESULTS: Whereas all activation tasks produced increased relative CBF in brain regions that correlated with articulation and auditory processing, only the two tasks that used real words (versus phonemes) showed left-lateralized rCBF increases in posterior superior temporal lobe (Wernickes area), and only the prose repetition task produced left lateralized activity in Brocas area.
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas automatic speech typically does not engage language cortex, repeating a memorized prose passage showed unambiguous activation in both Brocas and Wernickes areas. These results caution against the use of common automatic speech tasks for mapping eloquent cortex and suggest an alternative task for those with poor language abilities or acquired dysphasia who cannot perform standardized language tests reliably.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Saur, B. W. Kreher, S. Schnell, D. Kummerer, P. Kellmeyer, M.-S. Vry, R. Umarova, M. Musso, V. Glauche, S. Abel, et al. Ventral and dorsal pathways for language PNAS, November 18, 2008; 105(46): 18035 - 18040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ashtari, K. Perrine, R. Elbaz, U. Syed, E. Thaden, C. McIlree, R. Dolgoff-Kaspar, T. Clarke, A. Diamond, and A. Ettinger Mapping the Functional Anatomy of Sentence Comprehension and Application to Presurgical Evaluation of Patients with Brain Tumor AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1461 - 1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pinto, S. Thobois, N. Costes, D. Le Bars, A.-L. Benabid, E. Broussolle, P. Pollak, and M. Gentil Subthalamic nucleus stimulation and dysarthria in Parkinson's disease: a PET study Brain, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 602 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Gurd, K. Amunts, P. H. Weiss, O. Zafiris, K. Zilles, J. C. Marshall, and G. R. Fink Posterior parietal cortex is implicated in continuous switching between verbal fluency tasks: an fMRI study with clinical implications Brain, May 1, 2002; 125(5): 1024 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |