|
|
||||||||
From the Indiana University School of Medicine (Drs. Farlow, Lahiri, and Brashear), Indianapolis, IN; and Bayer Corporation (Drs. Cyrus, Nadel, and Gulanski), West Haven, CT.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Martin R. Farlow, Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Clinical Building,Room 583, 541 Clinical Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5111.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an interaction exists between APOE genotype and the response of AD patients to metrifonate treatment and whether APOE genotype independently affects the rate of AD progression.
BACKGROUND: Metrifonate is a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor for the treatment of AD symptoms.
METHODS: Data were pooled from four prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials and analyzed retrospectively. A total of 959 patients who received once-daily placebo (n = 374) or metrifonate (30 to 60 mg based on weight or a 50-mg fixed dose, n = 585) for up to 26 weeks agreed to APOE genotyping.
RESULTS: Metrifonate clearly improved the cognitive performance of the AD patients when compared with placebo (Alzheimers Disease Assessment ScaleCognitive Subscale [ADAS-Cog], p = 0.0001). The interaction of APOE genotype and the metrifonate effect on cognitive performance were not significant (p = 0.25). Metrifonate also clearly improved the global function of the AD patients when compared with placebo (Clinicians Interview-Based Impression of Change with Caregiver Input [CIBIC-Plus], p = 0.0001). The interaction of APOE genotype with the metrifonate effect on global function also was not significant (p = 0.70). No significant three-way interactions were observed among APOE genotype, gender, and response to metrifonate treatment (ADAS-Cog, p = 0.68; CIBIC-Plus, p = 0.26). APOE genotype did not influence disease progression as evaluated by either cognitive performance (ADAS-Cog, p = 0.93) or global function (CIBIC-Plus, p = 0.64).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from these studies of up to 26 weeks duration do not clearly support an interaction between APOE genotype and metrifonate treatment effects. They suggest that APOE genotypes do not necessarily predict an AD patients response to metrifonate treatment and that APOE genotype may not influence the rate of disease progression for patients with mild to moderate AD.
Key words: Acetylcholinesterase inhibitorDementiaAPOE genotypeClinical trialCognitionGlobal function.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Cosentino, N. Scarmeas, E. Helzner, M. M. Glymour, J. Brandt, M. Albert, D. Blacker, and Y. Stern APOE {varepsilon}4 allele predicts faster cognitive decline in mild Alzheimer disease Neurology, May 6, 2008; 70(19_Part_2): 1842 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Drzezga, M. Riemenschneider, B. Strassner, T. Grimmer, M. Peller, A. Knoll, S. Wagenpfeil, S. Minoshima, M. Schwaiger, and A. Kurz Cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with AD and different APOE genotypes Neurology, January 11, 2005; 64(1): 102 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hirono, M. Hashimoto, M. Yasuda, H. Kazui, and E. Mori Accelerated Memory Decline in Alzheimer's Disease With Apolipoprotein {epsilon}4 Allele J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, August 1, 2003; 15(3): 354 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Nobili, M. Koulibaly, P. Vitali, O. Migneco, G. Mariani, K. Ebmeier, A. Pupi, P. H. Robert, G. Rodriguez, and J. Darcourt Brain Perfusion Follow-Up in Alzheimer's Patients During Treatment with Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2002; 43(8): 983 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K Wilcock, S. Lilienfeld, and E. Gaens Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: multicentre randomised controlled trial BMJ, December 9, 2000; 321(7274): 1445 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Raskind, E. R. Peskind, T. Wessel, and W. Yuan Galantamine in AD: A 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 6-month extension Neurology, June 27, 2000; 54(12): 2261 - 2268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |