Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jääskeläinen, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Peltola, J. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jääskeläinen, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Peltola, J. K.
NEUROLOGY 1994;44:2356
© 1994 American Academy of Neurology

Clinical application of the blink reflex with stimulation of the mental nerve in lesions of the inferior alveolar nerve

Satu K. Jääskeläinen, MD and Juha K. Peltola, DDS

Departments of Clinical Neurophysiology (Dr. Jääskeläinen) and Oral Surgery (Dr. Peltola), University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland.

We evaluated the clinical usefulness of a new modification of the blink reflex (BR) test with electrical stimulation of the innervation area of the mental nerve (MN). We studied the MN BR in 28 patients with traumatic lesions of the inferior alveolar nerve and compared the results with the clinical sensory examination. Within 3 months of the trauma, the MN BR was abnormal in 18 of 20 nerves. In lesions older than 3 months, the test was often normal (in 9 of 11 nerves) despite subjective sensory symptoms and mild clinical signs. Anatomic obstacles to nerve regeneration also gave rise to abnormal MN BR in two patients examined 2 and 4 years after the trauma. The MN BR responses were often absent after violently traumatic lesions, whereas milder injuries commonly produced only latency prolongation of the reflex components. The MN BR is a useful objective method in the diagnosis of sensory loss in the distribution of the MN.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Satu K. Jääskeläinen, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Central Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4–8, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland.

Supported by a grant from the Orion Corporation Research Foundation.

Received March 16, 1994. Accepted in final form June 8, 1994.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
H. Forssell, O. Tenovuo, P. Silvoniemi, and S. K. Jaaskelainen
Differences and similarities between atypical facial pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain
Neurology, October 2, 2007; 69(14): 1451 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. K. Jaaskelainen, T. Teerijoki-Oksa, A. Virtanen, O. Tenovuo, and H. Forssell
Sensory regeneration following intraoperatively verified trigeminal nerve injury
Neurology, June 8, 2004; 62(11): 1951 - 1957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.