Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melamed, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melamed, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, J.
NEUROLOGY 1983;33:950
© 1983 American Academy of Neurology

Chronic L-dopa administration decreases striatal accumulation of dopamine from exogenous L-dopa in rats with intact nigrostriatal projections

Eldad Melamed, MD, Mordechai Globus, MD, Esther Friedlender, MS and Jutta Rosenthal, MS

Laboratory of Clinical Neurochemistry, Department of Neurology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.

To examine whether chronic administration of L-dopa can affect its own utilization in striatum, rats were injected once daily for 30 days with l-dopa and carbidopa or with saline. On day 31, saline and l-dopa animals were sacrificed 1, 2, or 3 hours after l-dopa injection. In rats given long-term l-dopa, the elevations in striatal dopamine concentrations induced by l-dopa administration were smaller and of shorter duration than those in controls. Such changes did not occur in animals pretreated with l-dopa for only 10 days. Results suggest that prolonged l-dopa therapy may decrease striatal accumulation of dopamine from exogenous l-dopa even when the nigrostriatal projections are intact. Therefore, it is possible that declining efficacy of l-dopa in parkinsonism may be due to effects of the drug itself and not only to disease progression.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Melamed, Department of Neurology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem. P.O.B. 12000, Israel.

Supported in part by the U.S.A.-Israel Binational Science Foundation Grant No. 2348, by the Chief Scientist's Office, Ministry of Health, Israel, and by a grant from the Warschaw family in honor of L. A. Harvey.

Presented in part at the thirty-fourth annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Washington, DC, April 1982

Accepted for publication November 8, 1982.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. H. V. Schapira and C. W. Olanow
Neuroprotection in Parkinson Disease: Mysteries, Myths, and Misconceptions
JAMA, January 21, 2004; 291(3): 358 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. E. Ahlskog
Slowing Parkinson's disease progression: Recent dopamine agonist trials
Neurology, February 11, 2003; 60(3): 381 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.