Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Synek, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Synek, V. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, J. C.
NEUROLOGY 1982;32:1347
© 1982 American Academy of Neurology

Somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with supraclavicular brachial plexus injuries

Vladimir M. Synek, M.D. and John C. Cowan, B.Sc.

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland. New Zealand.

In 12 patients with traumatic lesions of brachial plexus, we studied somatosensory evoked potentials by stimulation of median, radial, and ulnar nerves at the wrist and by recording at the arm, Erb point, cervical spinal cord, and contralateral cortex. Results after median nerve stumulation in patients with upper trunk lesions were normal. Patients with C5/6 root avulsion had either normal, delayed, or absent responses at the cervical cord and cortex, depending on the presence of complicating distal lesions. In patients with particular involvement of C7 root, results were normal after median and ulnar stimulation but were abnormal after radial nerve stimulation. In patients with multiple root avulsions and flail anesthetic arm, no potentials could be recorded from the cervical cord or contralateral cortex, regardless of which nerve was stimulated. For relevant information, it was important to stimulate nerves having roots near the anatomic site of the lesion as determined clinically and electromyographically.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Synek, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Accepted for publication May 13. 1982.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
D. G. Kline, E. R. Hackett, and L. H. Happel
Surgery for Lesions of the Brachial Plexus
Arch Neurol, February 1, 1986; 43(2): 170 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.