Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANSARI, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by VATASSERY, G. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ANSARI, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by VATASSERY, G. T.
NEUROLOGY 1975;25:688
© 1975 American Academy of Neurology

Quantitative estimation of cerebrospinal fluid globulins in multiple sclerosis

A comparison of electrophoretic and immunologic methods

K. A. ANSARI, M.D., KAY WELLS, B.S. and G. T. VATASSERY, Ph.D.

Neurology Service and Neuro-immunology Research Laboratory. Veterans Administration Hospital, and the Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

CSF samples were obtained from 44 multiple sclerosis patients during exacerbation and from 50 age and sex-matched non-multiple sclerosis controls. In an attempt to select the most suitable test for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, each sample was analyzed by three methods: (1) electrophoresis, (2) electroirmmunodiffusion, and (3) radial imrnunodiffusion (RID). Electrophoresis, electroimmunodiffusion, and radial imrnunodiffusion yielded positive results in 50, 55, and 59 percent of the multiple sclerosis patients respectively. Electrophoresis, electroimmunodiffusion, and radial imrnunodiffusion yielded 10,12, and 8 percent false positives (beyond mean ± 1 S.D.) respectively. Thus the three tests did not differ much with regard to yield of true or false positive results. When factors such as simplicity, time and equipment involved, and the interval between the test and results are taken into account, radial imrnunodiffusion appears to be most suitable for an average CSF diagnostic laboratory. For a laboratory with special interest in multiple sclerosis, agarose gel-electrophoresis of concentrated CSF appears to be the test of choice.

This investigation was supported by the Veteran's Administration, Received for publication December 6, 1974.

Dr. Ansari's address is Veterans Administration Hospital, 54th St. and 48th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55417.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
C. M. Poser, M. Alter, R. D. Currier, and S. E. Hunter
Common Demyelinating and Degenerative Diseases and Extrapyramidal Disorders--Panel 4
Arch Neurol, November 1, 1979; 36(12): 759 - 770.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.