Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SWIFT, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by IGNACIO, O. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SWIFT, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by IGNACIO, O. J.
NEUROLOGY 1975;25:1130
© 1975 American Academy of Neurology

Tick paralysis

Electrophysiologic studies

THOMAS R. SWIFT, M.D. and O. J. IGNACIO, M.D.

Electromyography laboratory, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia.

A patient with tick paralysis had motor and sensory nerve conduction studies before and after removal of an engorged tick. The amplitudes of muscle action potentials evoked by stimulation of motor nerves were reduced initially, returning to normal after the tick was removed. Distal motor and sensory latencies also shortened after removal, and conduction velocities were improved 6 months later. Direct stimulation of muscle produced a normal response, and tests of neuromuscular transmission were normal, including the response to edrophonium. These findings are compatible with experimental results showing effects of the toxin on motor nerve terminals as well as on large sensory and motor nerves.

Received for publication March 13, 1975.

Dr. Swift's address is EMG Laboratory, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30902.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
V. V. Vedanarayanan, O. B. Evans, and S.H. Subramony
Tick paralysis in children: Electrophysiology and possibility of misdiagnosis
Neurology, October 8, 2002; 59(7): 1088 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. W. Felz, C. D. Smith, and T. R. Swift
A Six-Year-Old Girl with Tick Paralysis
N. Engl. J. Med., January 13, 2000; 342(2): 90 - 94.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. H. Schaumburg and S. Herskovitz
The Weak Child -- A Cautionary Tale
N. Engl. J. Med., January 13, 2000; 342(2): 127 - 129.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
H. R. Jones JR
Topical Review: Childhood Guillain-Barre Syndrome: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Therapy
J Child Neurol, January 1, 1996; 11(1): 4 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
J. R. Donat and J. F. Donat
Tick Paralysis With Persistent Weakness and Electromyographic Abnormalities
Arch Neurol, January 1, 1981; 38(1): 59 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.